Post by cathysjun on Oct 21, 2012 7:12:57 GMT -5
My definition of heroes is those who persistently use their powers for altruistic matters. Those who can use their powers for others without expecting any rewards are true heroes. To me a hero is a soldier who takes a bullet for a little kid. A hero is someone who can run in front of a bus for his friends.
I disagree with the first video. I don¡¯t think it is wrong to call someone a hero for a heroic moment. And I don¡¯t think we misused the word hero. I do agree with the video that people have heroic moments and it is wrong to call a person a hero for one heroic moment. However I believe if a person continues to have a series of heroic moments then a person deserves to be called a hero.
For example in our contemporary society, Batman, Spiderman, Superman etc. are commonly depicted as heroes. I do believe they are heroes because all of them continue to use their powers for others. They do not perform a heroic moment and continue to live but they continue to perform heroic moments. This continuation of altruistic actions makes me believe that they are true heroes.
In that sense I believe that Gilgamesh was not a hero in the beginning. In the beginning of the story Gilgamesh used his super powers for his own good: to find eternal life. However in the end he uses the lessons he learns from his journey. He decides to become a good king and be good for his people. Hence in the end of the story I believe he was hero of the kingdom. I believe the Mesopotamian society had a different point of view of heroes with me in the beginning but the same in the end.
Thus I believe a hero is someone who helps others with his or her powers. I do agree with the video that heroes need to continue to be heroic. Also I agree that in the end Gilgamesh was a hero. However in the beginning he wasn¡¯t since he didn¡¯t use his powers for his own good. I don¡¯t think the powers are what make a person a hero but their actions.
I disagree with the first video. I don¡¯t think it is wrong to call someone a hero for a heroic moment. And I don¡¯t think we misused the word hero. I do agree with the video that people have heroic moments and it is wrong to call a person a hero for one heroic moment. However I believe if a person continues to have a series of heroic moments then a person deserves to be called a hero.
For example in our contemporary society, Batman, Spiderman, Superman etc. are commonly depicted as heroes. I do believe they are heroes because all of them continue to use their powers for others. They do not perform a heroic moment and continue to live but they continue to perform heroic moments. This continuation of altruistic actions makes me believe that they are true heroes.
In that sense I believe that Gilgamesh was not a hero in the beginning. In the beginning of the story Gilgamesh used his super powers for his own good: to find eternal life. However in the end he uses the lessons he learns from his journey. He decides to become a good king and be good for his people. Hence in the end of the story I believe he was hero of the kingdom. I believe the Mesopotamian society had a different point of view of heroes with me in the beginning but the same in the end.
Thus I believe a hero is someone who helps others with his or her powers. I do agree with the video that heroes need to continue to be heroic. Also I agree that in the end Gilgamesh was a hero. However in the beginning he wasn¡¯t since he didn¡¯t use his powers for his own good. I don¡¯t think the powers are what make a person a hero but their actions.